I would like to expand upon one of
the topics discussed in Baym’s Woman’s
Fiction that we did not get to cover as a class. Baym claims that heroines in Little Women either fall into the
category of “flawless” or “flawed”. “Flawless”
heroines, according to Baym, are mentally and emotionally strong. They are able to gracefully overcome hardships. However, “flawed” heroines are “defective”, struggling
in the face of difficulties. Some
heroines in the novel fit comfortably into these titles, while other characters
are a little more complicated.
In my opinion, Beth appears to be
the most “flawless” character. She
continuously shows grace, positivity, and virtue throughout the novel. These qualities are illustrated as early as
the first chapter, while each sister is explaining her faults. Beth has nothing to lament, and only strives
to continue to be a better daughter.
Another clearly “flawless” character is Marmee. The March daughters consistently look toward
their mother for guidance because she always seems to know the answers to their
problems. Her grace and strength even
shine through when she reveals her major character flaw to Jo at the end of Chapter
8. She explains that she has always
struggled with her anger, but has learned to control it.
I believe that Amy is shown as a “flawless”
character in the second half of the book.
Alcott emphasizes Amy’s growth in the years that transpire between the
two parts of the novel, saying that she was “possessed of that indescribable
charm called grace” (ch. 25, pg. 249).
Everyone who meets Amy seems to fall in love with her. Although desire for wealth is criticized
throughout the novel, Amy’s character shows that someone who seeks wealth can
also be virtuous.
On the other hand, Jo is clearly
the most “flawed” heroine in the novel. I
don’t believe Baym’s term should have a negative connotation, though. The most “flawed” characters in the novel are
basically the most dynamic. Jo’s faults make
her the most realistic character in the novel, which inherently makes her the
most flawed. Jo has constant battles
between her wild (and sometimes masculine) nature and the duty she feels toward
her family to be a proper woman. Her
struggle to subdue her anger is also a flaw that drives her character. Additionally, Meg may also be seen as a “flawed”
character. Over the course of the first
half of the novel, Meg constantly struggles with her desire for wealth. Although she has overcome much of this in the
latter half, this conflict occasionally resurfaces. We can see this battle in Chapter 28, when
she purchases fabric she cannot afford with Sallie Gardiner. These characteristics also make her both
flawed and realistic.
Nevertheless, both the “flawless”
and “flawed” heroines drive Little Women
and its underlying moral values.
The underlying concept of the flawed versus the flawless is extremely evident throughout Little Women. Expanding on your analysis of characters who are flawed and characters who are flawless, I think that Baym’s definition of flawless fits Marmee very well. “The flawless are those who already possess the emotional strength and stability to function effectively when adversity strikes” (Baym). I related this to how Marmee is a role model for her girls. In specific, this made me think of when Jo was really angry and frustrated with Amy as she had burned her manuscript (Chapter 8). Marmee too admits that she can become very angry in situations which set the example for Jo that you can be angry but you must keep under control. Marmee, while she struggles with anger, has the stability to function and still be a role model even in those times. Marmee’s role as the flawless character is vital to the plot of the book as it is comprised of a series of morals that Marmee and other adults teach the girls. I also agree with your analysis of the girls in the sense that they would all be considered “flawed” by Baym; they all are still learning and are not “stable…when adversity strikes”.
ReplyDelete