At first pass, when sorting the characters of
Little Women, one would be tempted to
put Beth and Mrs. March in one category of flawless and the rest of the March
sisters in the flawed category. According to Nina Baym’s book, Women’s Fiction, a female
lead can take one of two forms “the flawless and the flawed. The flawless are those who already possess
the emotional strength and stability to function effectively when adversity
strikes. The flawed are those whose characters are defective, so that triumph
in adversity becomes a matter of self-conquest as well as conquest of the other”
(35-36). Taking
Baym’s definition into account I think that Beth quite fits into the second
category of the flawed individual rather than the flawless. While Beth is often
regarded as the most angelic, viceless sister. She does not have the vanities
of Amy or Meg, nor does she have the rudderless boyish failings of Jo; yet, she
does have some obvious flaws. She is too shy or anxious to even go to school
with the other children or play the piano in Mr. Laurence’s house. She is the
meek, shy, mild, demur sister perhaps the most unrealistic on purpose she very
well fits the role of ‘proper’ little woman. Furthermore, her “triumph in
adversity” really does become a matter of “self-conquest.” When Beth is
overcome enough with emotion as to actually be able to talk to Mr. Laurence,
after he has bought her a piano, that is just one of many examples of her
overcoming her shyness in an act of self-conquest. Rather everything she does
is an act of self-conquest first as I would not describe her as especially
emotionally strong or stable enough to have an experience without overcoming
her great fears. In fact, I would argue that she doesn’t really have enough
character to be describes as emotionally strength and stability. I find her to
be a sort of tape measure in the story someone that can be used for the other girls
to be held up against. She does have the one distinguishing characteristic of
liking music and playing piano, allowing her to form a bond with Mr. Laurence.
However, I think the main role of Beth in the book is merely that of comparability
and to add a realistic element of tragedy as she dies. Even in her death she is
pretty angelic. She contracts her illness by being too faithful to the Hummel’s
as Chapter 17 is aptly named “Little Faithful” in her honor. Furthermore, she
tries her hardest not to be a burden to the family and only confesses her
fears, thereby placing her worries on another, to Jo (who is humanized and balanced
out by her meek younger sister). Thus, I rather feel that even if you can
consider Beth to have enough defining characteristics to be a character, rather
than a plot element I would argue that Beth is by Baym’s definition rather a
flawed one.
I do agree with you in that Beth does have some flaws in the form of her shyness, but I think that Beth and Mrs. March are the two best examples of "flawless" characters within Little Women. When we have discussed Beth in class, we tend to automatically label her as flawless, ignoring her shyness. In comparison to her sisters' vices, I think that Beth's is one that even before being conquered allows her to be the most angelic sister. Beth's lack of other vices means that when tragedy strikes the family, she overcomes it the easiest. For example at the start of the book, all of the sisters are commenting on how disappointing their Christmas would be. When it is Beth's turn to comment, all she says is "'we've got Father and Mother, and each other'" (p 3). This type of comment from Beth is seen throughout the book whenever hardship strikes the March family. Often times Beth is able to appreciate the things that the family has rather than being sad about what they don't have in a way that the other sisters cannot. Having this ability in spite of her vice is what I think makes Beth a good example for a flawless character.
ReplyDelete